ASYMMETRIC DEMOCRATIZATION: PLATFORM MARKET POWER IN RUSSIA'S AI MARKET

  • A.P. Dimenshtein HSE University, Moscow, Russia
  • D.M. Knatko HSE University, Moscow, Russia

Abstract

This paper examines how the market power of corporate platforms in the Russian artificial intelligence market simultaneously shapes the conditions of access to AI technologies for small and medium-sized enterprises and the conditions of scaling for independent AI startups. The problem stems from a contradiction: the contribution of the platform sector to the economy and the availability of ready-made AI services are both growing, while AI adoption among small organisations remains several times lower than among large ones, and the conditions under which independent supply of AI solutions is reproduced remain unexplored. Existing research treats the two sides in isolation and does not describe them as consequences of a single mechanism, which this study sets out to describe and conceptualise. Four objectives are addressed: describing infrastructure concentration in the Russian AI market; characterising platforms as an access channel for smaller firms; identifying the mechanisms that constrain the scaling of AI startups; and proposing an explanatory model linking the two sides. The methodology is combined: a secondary analysis of statistical and industry data on AI diffusion in Russian business, and a multiple case study based on ten semi-structured in-depth interviews with four groups of participants in the Russian AI ecosystem. The principal result is a configuration termed asymmetric democratization: control over computing infrastructure and its access interfaces widens the mass segment's access to using the technology while narrowing access to producing it. Across the ten cases, platform lock-in is found to have a two-level structure, model-level and infrastructure-level: open language models remove the first but not the second, and corporate accelerator programmes consistently fail to perform their declared scaling function. The results yield recommendations for AI startups, development institutions and regulators, while further research should test the proposed stage model longitudinally and operationalise platform lock-in through switching costs.

Keywords: asymmetric democratization, AI startups, switching costs, small and medium-sized enterprises, platform lock-in, boundary resources, platform market power, coopetition

Funding: the research had no sponsorship (own resources).

References

  • Korinek A., Vipra J. Concentrating Intelligence: Scaling and Market Structure in Artificial Intelligence // Economic Policy. 2025. Vol. 40(121). Pp. 225-256. DOI: 10.1093/epolic/eiae057
  • Van der Vlist F., Helmond A., Ferrari F. Big AI: Cloud Infrastructure Dependence and the Industrialisation of Artificial Intelligence // Big Data & Society. 2024. Vol. 11(1). DOI: 10.1177/20539517241232630
  • Kuzminov Ya.I., Kruchinskaya E.V., Koshel A.S., Akindinova N.V. The Effect of Digital Platforms on the Development of the Russian Economy: A Mathematical Model of Regulatory Effects and Empirical Verification // Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2025. Vol. 7. Pp. 5-24. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2025-7-5-24
  • Rasprostranenie II v organizacijah raznoj velichiny [The spread of AI in organizations of varying sizes] (2026). ISSEK HSE University. (In Russ.). URL: https://issek.hse.ru/news/1139129178.html (accessed on 03.09.2026).
  • Kretschmer T., Leiponen A., Schilling M., Vasudeva G. Platform Ecosystems as Meta-Organizations: Implications for Platform Strategies // Strategic Management Journal. 2022. Vol. 43(3). Pp. 405-424. DOI: 10.1002/smj.3250
  • Jacobides M.G., Cennamo C., Gawer A. Externalities and Complementarities in Platforms and Ecosystems: From Structural Solutions to Endogenous Failures // Research Policy. 2024. Vol. 53(1). DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2023.104906
  • Jovanovic M., Sjödin D., Parida V. Co-Evolution of Platform Architecture, Platform Services, and Platform Governance: Expanding the Platform Value of Industrial Digital Platforms // Technovation. 2022. Vol. 118(6). DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102218
  • Rong K., Zhao Y., Kang Z., Parente R. All-In-One Strategy of Platforms: Crafting Multiproduct Ecosystems // Technovation. 2026. Vol. 150. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103394
  • Motta M., Shelegia S. The "Kill Zone": When a Platform Copies to Eliminate a Potential Threat // Journal of Economics & Management Strategy. 2025. Vol. 34(3). Pp. 657-673. DOI: 10.1111/jems.12614
  • Engert M., Evers J., Hein A., Krcmar H. The Engagement of Complementors and the Role of Platform Boundary Resources in E-Commerce Platform Ecosystems // Information Systems Frontiers. 2022. Vol. 24. Pp. 2007-2025. DOI: 10.1007/s10796-021-10236-3
  • Wulfert T., Strobel G., Hoang H. Let's join Forces: Boundary Resources as Enablers of Value Co-Creation in E-Commerce Ecosystems // Electronic Commerce Research. 2025. Vol. 25(6). Pp. 4433-4470. DOI: 10.1007/s10660-024-09848-z
  • Hawlitschek F., Hodapp D. Challenges to Co-Creating Value in Nascent Platform Ecosystems: Gaps between Theory and Practice // International Journal of Electronic Commerce. 2024. Vol. 28(2). Pp. 156-185. DOI: 10.1080/10864415.2024.2332046
  • Mosterd L., Sobota V.C.M., van de Kaa G., Ding A.Y., de Reuver M. Context dependent Trade-Offs around Platform-to-Platform Openness: The Case of the Internet of Things // Technovation. 2021. Vol. 108. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102331
  • Ahmed N., Wahed M., Thompson N.C. The Growing Influence of Industry in AI Research // Science. 2023. Vol. 379(6635). Pp. 884-886. DOI: 10.1126/science.ade2420
  • Narayan D. Platform Capitalism and Cloud Infrastructure: Theorizing a Hyper-Scalable Computing Regime // Environment and Planning A. 2022. Vol. 54(5). Pp. 911-929. DOI: 10.1177/0308518X221094028
  • Widder D.G., Whittaker M., West S.M. Why 'Open' AI Systems are actually closed, and why this Matters // Nature. 2024. Vol. 635(8040). Pp. 827-833. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-08141-1
  • Moro-Visconti R., Cruz Rambaud S., López Pascual J. Artificial Intelligence-Driven Scalability and its impact on the Sustainability and Valuation of traditional Firms // Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 2023. Vol. 10(1). DOI: 10.1057/s41599-023-02214-8
  • Khanal S., Zhang H., Taeihagh A. Why and how is the Power of Big Tech increasing in the Policy Process? The Case of Generative AI // Policy and Society. 2025. Vol. 44(1). Pp. 52-69. DOI: 10.1093/polsoc/puae012
  • Cusumano M.A., Gawer A., Yoffie D.B. Can Self-Regulation save Digital Platforms? // Industrial and Corporate Change. 2021. Vol. 30(5). Pp. 1259-1285. DOI: 10.1093/icc/dtab052
  • Gawer A., Bonina C. Digital Platforms and Development: Risks to Competition and their Regulatory Implications in Developing Countries // Information and Organization. 2024. Vol. 34(3). DOI: 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2024.100525
  • Schwaeke J., Peters A., Kanbach D.K., Kraus S., Jones P. The New Normal: The Status Quo of AI Adoption in SMEs // Journal of Small Business Management. 2025. Vol. 63(3). Pp. 1297-1331. DOI: 10.1080/00472778.2024.2379999
  • Arroyabe M.F., Arranz C.F.A., Fernandez De Arroyabe I., Fernandez de Arroyabe J.C. Analyzing AI Adoption in European SMEs: A Study of Digital Capabilities, Innovation, and External Environment // Technology in Society. 2024. Vol. 79. DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102733
  • D'Amico E., Audretsch D.B., Belitski M., Colombelli A. Adopting Artificial Intelligence in Small and Medium Businesses: The Knowledge-Based Perspective // Small Business Economics. 2026. Vol. 67(2). Pp. 1019-1045. DOI: 10.1007/s11187-026-01214-7
  • Ayinaddis S.G. Artificial Intelligence Adoption Dynamics and Knowledge in SMEs and Large Firms: A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis // Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. 2025. Vol. 10(3). DOI: 10.1016/j.jik.2025.100682
  • Lins S., Pandl K.D., Teigeler H., Thiebes S., Bayer C., Sunyaev A. Artificial intelligence as a service // Business & Information Systems Engineering. 2021. Vol. 63(4). Pp. 441-456. DOI: 10.1007/s12599-021-00708-w
  • Sundberg L., Holmström J. Democratizing Artificial Intelligence: How No-Code AI can Leverage Machine Learning Operations // Business Horizons. 2023. Vol. 66(6). Pp. 777-788. DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2023.04.003
  • Rynok iskusstvennogo intellekta v Rossii vyros za god na 25% [The artificial intelligence market in Russia grew by 25% over the year] (2025). Smart Ranking. (In Russ.). URL: https://smartranking.ru/ru/analytics/ai/rynok-iskusstvennogo-intellekta-v-rossii-vyros-za-god-na-25/ (accessed on 03.09.2026).
  • Rossijskij rynok oblachnyh infrastrukturnyh servisov 2025 [The Russian market of cloud infrastructure services in 2025] (2025). iKS-Consulting. (In Russ.). URL: http://survey.iksconsulting.ru/page94048076.html (accessed on 03.09.2026).
  • Rogova E.M., Fefelov D.L., Kochetkova D.V. Is Venture Capital Interested in Sustainable Development Technologies? An Analysis of the Russian Market // Economic Policy. 2025. Vol. 20(4). Pp. 52-81. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18288/1994-5124-2025-4-52-81
  • Grishin D.L. Empirical Analysis of Macroeconomic Factors Affecting the Russian Venture Capital Market // Fundamental Research. 2025. Vol. 5. Pp. 21-26. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17513/fr.43828
  • Kouzminov Y., Kruchinskaia E. An Efficiency Assessment of the Artificial Intelligence Market: Exploring the Limits // Foresight and STI Governance. 2025. Vol. 19(4). Pp. 6-16. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17323/fstig.2025.29079
  • Frolov I.E., Kiselev V.N. Artificial Intelligence as a Driver of Breakthrough Technologies: Global Trends and Lessons for Russia // Problems of Forecasting. 2025. Vol. 3(210). Pp. 122-134. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.47711/0868-6351-210-122-134
  • Myzrova K.A., Panko Yu.V., Ovchinnikova S.V., Bryukhachev V.A. Digital Transformation of Small Business: Opportunities, Prospects and Obstacles // Creative Economy. 2024. Vol. 18(12). Pp. 3251-3268. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18334/ce.18.12.122173
  • Kazhdyj tretij predstavitel' MSP ispol'zuet iskusstvennyj intellekt v rabote [Every third representative of SMEs uses artificial intelligence in their work] (2024). NAFI. (In Russ.). URL: https://nafi.ru/analytics/kazhdyy-tretiy-predstavitel-msp-ispolzuet-iskusstvennyy-intellekt-v-rabote/ (accessed on 03.09.2026).
  • Melesse H.S., Knatko D.M. The Contingent Effects of Strategic Orientations and Strategic Capabilities on Competitive Performance: Evidence from Ethiopian Manufacturing Enterprises // Heliyon. 2024. Vol. 10(15). DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35497
  • Avdasheva S.B., Khomik O.S., Chesnokov V.S., Khlyupina V.A. Impact of the Scale Effect of Recommendation Systems on Competition in Digital Platform Sectors // Problemy Prognozirovaniya. 2025. Vol. 3(210). Pp. 135-145. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.47711/0868-6351-210-135-145

About the Authors

Anastasiia P. Dimenshtein – Graduate Student, HSE University, Moscow, Russia. E-mail: dimenshtein_nast@mail.ru. ORCID 0009-0005-5209-2300.

Dmitrii M. Knatko – Ph.D.; Associate Professor, HSE University, Moscow, Russia. E-mail: dknatko@hse.ru. SPIN RINTS 7964-7116. ORCID 0000-0001-8960-860X. ResearcherID E-3017-2016. Scopus Author ID 35368637300.

For citation: Dimenshtein A.P., Knatko D.M. Asymmetric Democratization: Platform Market Power in Russia's AI Market // BENEFICIUM. 2026. Vol. 3(60). Pp. 68-79. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.34680/BENEFICIUM.2026.3(60).68-79

Published
2026-09-06
Section
PLATFORM SOLUTIONS AND AI TECHNOLOGIES IN MODERN INDUSTRY MANAGEMENT