INNOVATION, INFORMATIZATION, INDUSTRY: STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF MACROECONOMIC DYNAMICS IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

Abstract

The transition to a new technological order in the medium term requires structural changes in the Russian economy. These changes are closely related to accelerated innovative development. The aim of the study is to analyze the structural transformations of the national economy of the Russian Federation from the standpoint of innovative changes that we associate with the development of information and communication technologies (digital revolution), as well as the role of industry in the implementation of these changes. The object of study is the Russian economy and its structure in dynamics. The author's research methodology is based on a systematic approach and a dialectical method, one of the principles of which is the transition from quantitative changes to qualitative ones. The subject of study is the structural transition of the national economy to a new qualitative state. For this, quantitative and then qualitative changes in the national economic system have been studied, which ultimately lead to a new stage of development, the formation of an innovative economy. In this regard, we should talk about a neo-industrial economy, in which the industry is structurally changing, technologically transforming and servicing. In the context of the structural transition under consideration, the manufacturing industry and the degree of its development, technical and technological excellence, the level of innovation become the key factors for the success of the transition. The study shows that in the context of active informatization (digitalization), the face of the manufacturing industry and its sectoral composition are changing. The manufacturing industry, while qualitatively changing under the influence of informatization and innovation and technological shifts, remains the core of further sustainable development and functioning of the economy. This is confirmed by a structural analysis of macroeconomic data for the Russian Federation. Despite the fact that the structure of the Russian economy in the sectoral context has remained fairly stable in recent decades, it can be traced (so far weak, but already visible) evolutionary changes confirming a gradual movement towards a structural transition to a new type of economy. This movement, according to the authors, requires more active support within the framework of state economic policy.

Keywords

innovative development, information and communication technologies, national economy, new technological order, manufacturing industry, economic structure, structural transition, digitalization of the economy

References

Bykau A.A., Parkhimenka U.A., and TolkachevS.A. Influence of Covid-19 on the Russian economy: methodological approaches to the assessment based on the input-output tables // Belarusian Economic Journal. 2020. Vol. 2(91). Рp. 25-37. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.46782/1818-4510-2020-2-25-37

VertakovaYu.V., Zaretskaya V.G., and Plotnikov V.A. Covid-19 and European integration: will the coronavirus pandemic trigger the collapse of the European Union? // Sustainable Development Management. 2020. Vol. 3(28). Рp. 5-16. (In Russ.).

VertakovaYu.V., and Feoktistova T.V. Implementation of anti-crisis measures for the population and business in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic // Economics and Management. 2020. Vol. 26(5-175). Рp. 444-454. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2020-5-444-454

Maksimtsev I.A., and Mezhevich N.M. Global economy after the shock of the first semester of 2020: old problems in new conditions // Bulletin of the St. Petersburg State University of Economics. 2020. Vol. 3(123). Рp. 22-27. (In Russ.).

Mukhortov D.V. Specificity of anti-crisis management of an enterprise in a turbulent economic environment / Research of the innovative potential of society and the formation of directions for its strategic development: a collection of scientific articles of the 10th All-Russian scientific and practical conference with international participation, Kursk, 2020. Рp. 346-350. (In Russ.).

Plotnikov V.A. The Covid-19 pandemic and the behavior of Russians: some observations // Theory and practice of service: economy, social sphere, technologies. 2020. Vol. 2(44). Рp. 19-23. (In Russ.).

Yusufova A.M. Environmental shocks and viability of organizations // Theory and practice of service: economics, social sphere, technologies. 2020. Vol. 3(45). Рp. 23-26. (In Russ.).

Dance A. Coronavirus vaccines get a biotech boost // Nature. 2020. Vol. 583(7817). Pp. 647-649. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-02154-2

Senior M. Biotech companies prepare for Covid-19 downturn // Nature biotechnology. 2020. Vol. 38(6). Pp. 663-664.

Borkova E.A., Bondarev A.D., and Chernykh A.Yu. Role of new technologies in economic informatization // Bulletin of Science and Education. 2020. Vol. 10-4(88). Рp. 33-37. (In Russ.).

Vershinina I.A. “Smart” cities: prospects for the emergence and development in Russia // Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science. 2016. Vol. 22(2). Pp. 163-175. (In Russ.).

Vorotynskaya A.M., and Pozdeeva E.A. Intellectual digital technologies in the development of modern society / Intellectual and information technologies in the formation of a digital society: a collection of scientific articles of an ISC, St. Petersburg State University of Economics, 2017. Рp. 34-42. (In Russ.).

Abdurakhmanova E.E.K., and KurbanovA.Kh. Digital technologies in the logistics system: risk assessment // Competency. 2020. Vol. 5. Pp. 10-14. (In Russ.).

Corrêa H.L., and Corrêa D.G. Polymer Applications for Medical Care in the COVID-19 Pandemic Crisis: Will We Still Speak Ill of These Materials? // Frontiers in Materials. 2020. Vol. 7. P. 283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2020.00283

Siwal S.S., Zhang Q., Saini A.K., and Thakur V.K. Antimicrobial materials: New strategies to tackle various pandemics // Journal of Renewable Materials. 2020. Vol. 8(12). Pp. 1543-1563. DOI: https://www.techscience.com/jrm/v8n12/40540

Kotlyarov I.D. Platformy iekosistemykaksovremennaya forma ekonomicheskoiorganizatsii [Platforms and ecosystems as a modern form of economic organization] / Proceedings of the IX All-Russian Symposium on Economic Theory: collection of reports of section sessions, Institute of Economics, RAS Ural Branch, Yekaterinburg, 2020. Рp.57-58. (In Russ.).

Shvetsov A.N. From “e-government” towards “digital governance”: the significance and effect of innovations // ECO. 2019. Vol. 12(546). Рp. 8-26. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.30680/ECO0131-7652-2019-12-8-26

Plotnikov V.A., and Fedotova G.V. The state budgetary policy in the conditions of crisis: regional aspect // Administrative consulting. 2015. Vol. 4(76). Рp. 59-69. (In Russ.).

Federal Law “On Science and State Science and Technology Policy” on August 23, 1996 No. 127-FL (last revision) (1996). ConsultantPlus. (In Russ.). URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_11507/ (accessed on 21.12.2020).

Bodrunov S.D. Noonomics: monograph. Moscow: Cultural revolution, 2018. 432 p. (In Russ.).

Selishcheva T.A. The structure of the Russian economy: on the way to an information society. PublishinghouseSPbSUEF, 2006. 184 p. (In Russ.).

Federal State Statistic Service: “Gross Value Added at current prices (bln. rubles) to 2011”. (2020). (In Russ.). URL: http://www.gks.ru/free_doc/new_site/vvp/vvp-god/tab10.xls (accessed on 21.12.2020).

Federal State Statistic Service: “Gross Value Added at current prices (bln. rubles) to 2019” (2020). (In Russ.). URL: https://rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/tab10-3.xlsx (accessed on 21.12.2020).

Federal State Statistic Service: “Key indicators of innovation performance” (2020). (In Russ.). URL: https://rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/hbQOPQbo/innov-n16.xls (accessed on 21.12.2020).

Federal State Statistic Service: “Innovation activity of organizations (the share of organizations carrying out technological, organizational, marketing innovations in the reporting year, in the number of surveyed organizations) by type of economic activity”.(2020). (In Russ.). URL: https://rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/yIkSDjql/innov-n1.xls (accessed on 21.12.2020).

Federal State Statistic Service: “Share of technology innovation organizations in the total number of organizations surveyed, by type of economic activity, for the Russian Federation” (2020). (In Russ.). URL: https://rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/UUpSt5tN/innov-n2.xls (accessed on 21.12.2020).

Federal State Statistic Service: “Share of marketing innovation organizations in the total number of organizations surveyed, by type of economic activity, for the Russian Federation” (2020). (In Russ.). URL: https://rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/innov-n8.xls (accessed on 21.12.2020).

Federal State Statistic Service: “Proportion of organizations implementing organizational innovations, by type of economic activity” (2020). (In Russ.). URL: https://rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/innov-n9.xls (accessed on 21.12.2020).

Federal State Statistic Service: “Proportion of organizations implementing environmental innovations in the total number of organizations surveyed, by type of economic activity, for the Russian Federation” (2020). (In Russ.). URL: https://rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/GdIihaWG/innov-n10.xls (accessed on 21.12.2020).

About the Authors

Natalya Yu. Nabatova – Assistant Business Appraiser; Institute of Entrepreneurship Problems LLC, Saint Petersburg, Russia. E-mail: nanabatova@gmail.com. SPIN РИНЦ 3621-8074

Vladimir A. Plotnikov – Doctor of Economics, Professor; Professor, Southwest State University, Kursk, Russia. E-mail: Plotnikov_2000@mail.ru. SPIN РИНЦ 4075-8257. ORСID 0000-0002-3784-6195

For citation

Nabatova N.Yu., Plotnikov V.A. Innovation, Informatization, Industry: Structural Analysis of Macroeconomic Dynamics in the Russian Federation // BENEFICIUM. 2021. Vol. 1(38). Pp. 90-99. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.34680/BENEFICIUM.2021.1(38).90-99